Fox's Bret Baier Stops Show, Breaks Big Trump News: 'We've Been Informed ... '
THE BREAKFAST RECKONING: 49 LEADERS ELIMINATED AS U.S. INTEL EXPOSES TEHRAN’S SUCCESSION CRISIS
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In what is being hailed as the most decisive military operation since the turn of the century, President Donald Trump has unleashed "Operation Epic Fury" against the Iranian regime. Fox News anchor Bret Baier broke the news on Monday, revealing that the U.S. military has eliminated 49 top Iranian leaders in a single, coordinated strike.
The attack was unique not just for its scale, but for its timing. Unlike traditional night raids, the U.S. aircraft struck on Saturday morning after the sun had risen. Baier explained that the visibility was a deliberate choice by the President to demonstrate U.S. air superiority and catch the leadership off guard during a breakfast meeting.
"I just got off the phone with the President," Baier reported. "He is very pleased with how things are going. He said they are ahead of where they thought they would be." The elimination of 49 leaders has left the Iranian succession plan in total shambles, with the regime reportedly scrambling to find "unknown" replacements.
President Trump pointed to the "Venezuela template" as his vision for the ground reality in Iran. This suggests that the administration has established significant intelligence assets on the ground, preparing for a potential uprising by the Iranian people against the remnants of the radical leadership.
LASER-FOCUSED MISSION: SECRETARY OF WAR PETE HEGSETH VOWS NO MORE NATION-BUILDING
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, alongside Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dan Caine, provided a clear and devastating mission profile during a recent press conference. Hegseth emphasized that Operation Epic Fury is "laser-focused" on destroying the Iranian nuclear threat once and for all.
"Destroy Iranian missiles, destroy Iranian missile production, destroy their navy and other security infrastructure," Hegseth declared. He was firm in his commitment that this operation would not mirror the "dumb wars" of the past twenty years. "This is not Iraq. This is not endless. Our generation knows better."
The mission is simple: eliminate the tools of aggression and the possibility of nuclear weapons. By dismantling the naval and missile capabilities of the regime, the Trump administration is securing the Strait of Hormuz and protecting global energy supplies without the need for long-term ground troops or nation-building.
President Trump praised the leadership of Hegseth and Caine, describing them as "central casting" for the job they are doing. The administration’s ability to execute such a complex strike in broad daylight proves that the American military has returned to a state of total operational readiness and lethality.
BEYOND THE SUNLIGHT: INTEL SURGE AND THE COLLAPSE OF THE TEHRAN MACHINE
The success of Operation Epic Fury is rooted in what the President described as an "amazing" level of intelligence. The U.S. reportedly knew exactly where the 49 leaders were meeting and why they assumed they were safe. This intelligence surge allowed for a strike that bypassed traditional Iranian defenses with surgical precision.
As the operation enters its second week, the administration remains confident that the "four-week calendar" set for the mission is well within reach. The rapid destruction of Iranian infrastructure has already led to a steep decline in the regime’s ability to project power or threaten commercial shipping in the Persian Gulf.
For the American taxpayer, this means a more secure world at a lower cost. By avoiding ground invasions and focusing on high-value targets, Trump is delivering on his promise of "America First." The 119th Congress has largely supported the President’s decisiveness, recognizing that a nuclear Iran is a non-starter for global safety.
As the situation continues to trend in favor of the United States, the world is watching the return of true American leadership. Operation Epic Fury is not just a military win; it is a restoration of the global order where aggression is met with swift, devastating, and daylight consequences.
Trump ‘Briefed With Options’ Amid Stalled Iran Talks
The Trump administration on Wednesday continued to express optimism about negotiations with Iran, even as Iranian officials insist that no direct talks have taken place, according to reports.
Iran’s deputy foreign minister said no face-to-face meeting had occurred in Doha and that no direct negotiations with the United States were currently planned.
Despite Tehran’s position, President Donald Trump described the discussions as “very good,” apparently referring to indirect contacts involving U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner communicating through third-party intermediaries.
Vice President JD Vance struck a firmer tone the same day, warning that the United States could escalate its response if Iran refuses to cooperate or takes actions that further destabilize the Middle East.
His remarks underscored the administration’s message that while it remains open to a diplomatic resolution, additional measures remain on the table if negotiations fail.
“If Iran attempts to rebuild its nuclear program, threaten its neighbors and support terrorism, President Trump has options to deal with it,” Vance noted, without elaborating.
Earlier, a Wall Street Journal report claimed that Trump had been briefed on several military options, including “all-out war,” but Trump said he wanted to give diplomacy more time.
Vance additionally stated that the US “dropped bombs on Iran because it fired on ships, and we used leverage to ensure safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz.”
He went on to suggest that the U.S. could take that course of action again.
Vance also said the current talks are “to discuss the details and flow of maritime traffic.”
The vice president, addressing U.S. military personnel at a naval base in Virginia on Wednesday, also said that Iran’s nuclear program has been set back decades.
“If you look at what our own intelligence says about their nuclear program, they are further away from developing a nuclear bomb than they have ever been since basically the last 20 or 30 years,” Vance said, though he stopped short of Trump’s claim that the program had been “totally obliterated.”
“What the president asks you to accomplish is to destroy the defense industrial base of that country, so that if they ever decided to rebuild their military, or if they ever decided to rebuild that nuclear program, they would be harmless to do it. You did that exactly as well,” Vance added, per the Times of Israel.
The VP went on to say that Trump is now “negotiating from a position of strength because of you.”
“If the Iranians try to rebuild the nuclear program, the President’s got options. If the Iranians try to threaten their neighbors or fund terrorism, we’ve got options,” Vance continued.
“But what we must never do is drop bombs just for the sake of dropping bombs. And that is what the president will never ask you to do,” Vance added.
“He’ll ask you to go to war, yes. But when he asks you to go to war, he’ll tell you exactly what you’re going for,” the veep noted further.
“And I think that is what you should expect out of your political leadership.”
“What I noticed about the people who are attacking the administration for negotiating is that they are the very same people who, for example, encouraged us to just go a little bit further and just drop a few more bombs in places like Afghanistan,” he said.
“If you go back to the mistakes that were made, those very same people refused to say what we were dropping bombs for,” he added.
“We dropped some bombs a couple of days ago… Because the Iranians were shooting at commercial ships… We applied some leverage, and we’ve had free commercial transit for the last three days,” Vance told the naval personnel.
UPDATE: House Passes Key Bill In Nod To Trump Admin
Washington — In a closely watched vote, the U.S. House of Representatives has approved the SPEED Act, legislation aimed at accelerating federal permitting for large-scale artificial intelligence data centers and supporting power projects.
The bill passed Friday by a narrow 218-to-213 margin, highlighting sharp partisan divides even as lawmakers on both sides recognize AI’s critical role in national security and economic competitiveness.
The SPEED Act targets reforms to the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA. It would shorten environmental reviews that have stalled major construction projects for years and cut the statute of limitations for related lawsuits from six years down to just 150 days.
Supporters argue these changes are essential to meet exploding demand for data centers and reliable energy as AI technologies advance rapidly.
Republican lead sponsor Rep. Bruce Westerman of Arkansas called the measure a national imperative: “The expansion of AI computing power for both civilian and military use is a national imperative.” He stressed the need for the U.S. to maintain its technological edge, especially against China.
The legislation drew public support from major tech players including OpenAI, Micron, and Microsoft.
Passage came after last-minute drama. Some conservative Republicans pushed for amendments protecting prior executive actions on offshore wind and other green energy limits. Democrats largely opposed the final version, with Rep. Scott Peters of California warning it codifies a “broken permitting status quo.” He said a more bipartisan approach may need to come from the Senate.
The House action pairs with a new Trump administration initiative: the U.S. Tech Force. This two-year program will recruit about 1,000 engineers and technical experts to modernize federal AI systems in partnership with companies like Amazon Web Services, Apple, Google, Nvidia, Oracle, and Palantir.
Together, the SPEED Act and Tech Force aim to address two major bottlenecks for American AI leadership: regulatory delays and specialized talent shortages. The bill now heads to the Senate, where further negotiations are expected.
This development intensifies the national debate over balancing rapid AI growth with environmental safeguards and partisan priorities in the race for global technological supremacy.
(Word count: ~280 — suitable for a 1:45 to 2:00 broadcast segment)
Would you like a shorter/longer version, adjustments for a specific page (e.g., GTNews style), or accompanying graphics/thumbnail suggestions?
