Supreme Court Retains GOP District in NY, Giving Republicans Midterms Win
The Supreme Court on Monday said it would keep New York’s current congressional map in place, temporarily blocking a lower court ruling that had found the map violated the Constitution by diluting the voting power of Black and Latino residents.
The unsigned emergency order did not include a vote count or written reasoning, which is typical for decisions issued on the court’s emergency docket. The decision allows the existing map to remain in place while appeals continue, making it likely the map will be used in the upcoming midterm elections, the New York Times
The ruling was a victory for Republicans and could help them retain control of a closely divided House of Representatives.
Representative Nicole Malliotakis, a Republican whose district includes Staten Island and parts of southern Brooklyn, filed the emergency application after a state judge ordered her district to be redrawn.
In a statement, Malliotakis said the justices had “stopped the voters on Staten Island and in southern Brooklyn from being stripped of their ability to elect a representative who reflects their values.”
The case centers on New York’s 11th Congressional District, the only district in New York City currently held by a Republican.
The dispute is one of several mid-cycle redistricting battles that have reached the Supreme Court after President Donald Trump encouraged Republicans to pursue map changes that could strengthen the party’s position in Congress.
Texas redrew its congressional map, and California voters approved a ballot measure revising that state’s map in a way that favored Democrats.
In both instances, legal challenges were brought to the Supreme Court, and the justices allowed the new maps to be used for the midterms.
The New York case also unfolds as the court considers a separate voting rights dispute, Louisiana v. Callais, involving the creation of a second majority minority district in Louisiana.
A ruling in that case could have broader implications for congressional maps nationwide.
In the New York matter, the court’s three liberal justices dissented.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote in a 13-page dissent that the court had inserted itself into election law disputes during an active redistricting cycle.
“By granting these applications, the court thrusts itself into the middle of every election law dispute around the country, even as man
y states redraw their congressional maps ahead of the 2026 election,” Sotomayor wrote.
She warned that the decision could prompt more emergency appeals “without even bothering to ask the state courts first.”
Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., writing in concurrence, said he supported blocking the lower court’s order.
He wrote that the lower court had engaged in “blatantly discriminated on the basis of race,” calling it “unadorned racial discrimination” that violated the Constitution.
The legal challenge began last October when four New Yorkers sued over the district held by Malliotakis.
The lawsuit was filed by the Elias Law Group, which has represented Democratic interests in redistricting cases.
In January, Manhattan Justice Jeffrey H. Pearlman ruled that the 2024 map showed a pattern of discrimination against minority voters and ordered the state to reconvene its Independent Redistricting Commission.
Pearlman previously served as special counsel to Governor Kathy Hochul.
Malliotakis filed her emergency application on Feb. 12 to Justice Sotomayor, who handles emergency matters from that region.
Court filings show that the Black and Latino population in the 11th District has grown to about 30 percent, up from 11 percent over the past four decades.
Despite that demographic shift, the district has become more conservative.
It was the only New York City district won by Donald Trump in 2016, and in 2020, he carried it over Joseph R. Biden Jr. by 24 percentage points.
That same year, Malliotakis defeated incumbent Democrat Max Rose.
Clinton Approved Plan To ‘Smear’ Trump With Fake Russia Collusion: Docs
Newly declassified documents reveal that twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton endorsed a strategy devised by one of her campaign aides to “smear” then-candidate Donald Trump with unfounded allegations of Russian involvement and divert attention from her own growing email issue during the 2016 race.
The strategy called for “raising the theme of ‘Putin’s support for Trump'” and “subsequently steering public opinion toward the notion that it needs to equate” genuine electoral infrastructure tampering with the Russian leader’s political influence effort.
“Clinton approved a plan proposed by one of her foreign policy advisors, Julianne Smith, to ‘smear Donald Trump by magnifying the scandal tied to the intrusion by the Russian special services in the pre-election process to benefit the Republican candidate,’” one of the declassified
memos read.
Special Counsel John Durham discovered the information during a multi-year investigation into intelligence operations related to the 2016 election.
At Sen. Chuck Grassley’s (R-Iowa) request, FBI Director Kash Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and other US intelligence officials declassified the files from Durham’s investigation.
“Based on the Durham annex, the Obama FBI failed to adequately review and investigate intelligence reports showing the Clinton campaign may have been ginning up the fake Trump-Russia narrative for Clinton’s political gain, which was ultimately done through the Steele Dossier and other means,” Grassley said in a statement.
“These intelligence reports and related records, whether true or false, were buried for years. History will show that the Obama and Biden administrations’ law enforcement and intelligence agencies were weaponized against President Trump,” he added.
“This political weaponization has caused critical damage to our institutions and is one of the biggest political scandals and cover-ups in American history. The new Trump administration has a tremendous responsibility to the American people to fix the damage done and do so with maximum speed and transparency.”
Last week, Director of Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released newly declassified memos that also showed U.S. intelligence officials concluded Russia did not play a significant role in Donald Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton.
Paul Sperry, a senior reporter for Real Clear Investigations, took to X to report that sources informed him that there are damning text messages and emails showing coordination between the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign aides.
“DEVELOPING: I’m told there are texts/emails indicating Hillary Clinton campaign aides directly coordinated with the Obama White House, NSC, State Dept and Intelligence Community officials in efforts to dig up dirt tying Donald Trump to Vladimir Putin in July 2016 …developing…” Perry wrote on X.
The documents released by Gabbard are the clearest proof yet that officials within the Obama administration had serious doubts about Russian interference, even as they proceeded with the investigation.
The memo, dated 2016, told then-President Barack Obama directly that “Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.”
While acknowledging prior reports about a possible breach of Illinois voter rolls and failed targeting attempts in other states, the memo clearly states that those efforts never compromised voting systems—and didn’t come close to altering results.
“The targeting of infrastructure not used in casting ballots makes it highly unlikely it would have resulted in altering any state’s official vote,” the document reads. It goes further: “Criminal activity also failed to reach the scale and sophistication necessary to change election outcomes.”
The disclosure is a major vindication for Trump, who has long argued that the Russia collusion narrative was a hoax pushed by the Clinton campaign and Obama intelligence officials to sabotage his presidency before it began.
And now the pressure is turning on the people who pushed it.
May you like
FBI officials are preparing the groundwork for a possible criminal investigation into former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey, and others involved in launching and running the Crossfire Hurricane probe.
This documents falsely claimed connections between Trump and Russian agents.
